Friday, November 25, 2011

STORM WATER TIPS

By: Garry H. Peterson President IGBC

Have you ever had standing water on your business property or in your back yard and wondered what you could do or who can help? Most water drainage related issues that occur are sump pump discharge, improperly graded or unmaintained (silted) swales, construction/landscaping items within the swale, or leaking irrigation/water supply lines.

It is the responsibility of the property owner to address these issues. The local municipality is responsibilities are limited to damage issues that occur within the road right-of-way or that are associated with cast iron drains and concrete storm pipe that have been publicly dedicated to the ciry/town.

If you have standing water problems, here are a few tips to help you assess the problem:
First, determine if you have a large amount of water regularly backing up during smaller rain events in the vicinity of a storm drain.  If this is true, you should call your local municipal authority to report a potential clog within the storm sewer system that may need maintenance.

If you do not have a drain near you, or you do not have water standing near a storm drain, but have water standing in other portions of the drainage easement or the rear or side yard easement, look for a water source such as a sump pump discharge, a leaking water supply or irrigation line, or a buried roof downspout. If the standing water occurs regularly even during dry periods, the problem is most likely related to a sump pump or irrigation/water supply line leak since these can be continual sources.

Monday, November 21, 2011

ENERGY INDEPENDENCE AND SECURITY ACT

By: Garry H. Peterson President IGBC
Next year (2012) the first phase of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 will take effect, requiring light bulbs to be 30% more energy-efficient and beginning the phase-out of traditional incandescent bulbs.

This means CFL bulbs rather than the ones most people are accustom to purchasing.  However, there maybe an alternative to CFL bulbs and they may not be the only option. LED lighting has come a long way, “it’s starting to make a splash” according to people in the lighting industry.  Judge for yourself as to what is best for you, the environment and governmental regulations.

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Outdoor Retailer Regroups to Remain Green by Tina Marie Bibergall

Recent green reports indicated that Timberland, the American manufacturer and retailer of outdoor wear, had a carbon footprint that increased by 11 percent last quarter. Alarming news for a company that boasts landing the 78th slot in the 2007 CNN Money “One hundred best companies to work for” list and prides itself on corporate social responsibility.

This news was not taken lightly by the powers-that-be at Timberland, and they had answers for why greenhouse gas emissions increased in the second quarter of 2011 and continued to commit to reducing these emissions in the future.

As the US economy improves, this is a trend we will see more often among even the most earth-friendly companies. As executives at Timberland cited, there is usually a direct correlation between business growth and greenhouse gas emission growth due to factors such as increased energy output to operate new stores or expand operating hours in existing stores, increase in employee air travel, and increased shipping needs to keep store shelves stocked.

As a green-conscious company, Timberland will aggressively monitor greenhouse gas emissions for the remainder of 2011; even though its business forecast predicts continued growth, the goal will be for gas emissions to remain constant.

As a green-conscious company, Timberland will aggressively monitor greenhouse gas emissions for the remainder of 2011; even though its business forecast predicts continued growth, the goal will be for gas emissions to remain constant.

Additionally, Timberland has renewed its previous goal to reduce emissions by 50% (this goal identified 2006 emissions as a baseline and was to be attained by 2010; Timberland fell short but had an admirable 38 percent decline). Taking into account business expansion plans, Timberland extended its 50% reduction goal to the year 2015.

It is noteworthy that although Timberland’s Q2 results feel short of expectations, the company’s overall trends over the past few years showed a steady decline of both emissions and electricity demands. In fact, in 2010 revenue increased while emissions and electricity demand showed little, if any, change.

According to Timberland’s Beth Holzman, Manager of Corporate Social Responsibility and Reporting, Timberland is focusing on four main strategies to reduce their carbon footprint while continuing to enjoy corporate financial growth. They are as follows (as first reported by GreenBiz.com)

1) Targeting the Big Wins: Timberland will target its biggest, most energy-intensive facilities for renewable energy exploration. For example, Holzman pointed out that some of Timberland’s larger European offices can utilize clean energy options from utilities that have the infrastructure to offer it at a reasonable rate. By targeting the biggest companies, emissions would be significantly reduced.

2) Buying Energy in Bulk: If Timberland can purchase bulk energy in the US and Europe, it can then use the cost-saving to purchase clean energy later. Holzman notes that if the company can come up with creative ways to not increase total cost, but reinvent the way it is allocated then the overall footprint can be reduced.

3) Incentives for Less Travel: When business and revenue rises, often so does corporate travel. Timberland must ensure that its worldwide production is meeting company standards, but incentives can be developed to encourage individual business units to prioritize and compartmentalize air travel.

4) Quarterly Reporting: Timberland firmly believes that social and environmental data should be reported on a quarterly basis in order to provide the most up-to-date decision-making tools; this data has been reported quarterly since 2008.

Holzman points out that Timberland treats social and environmental decisions with the same weight as every other aspect of the business. Quarterly reporting lends itself to making necessary mid-course corrections or shifts in priorities on a timelier basis.

In addition, Holzman cited that since 2006, annual savings as a result of Timberland’s environmental program have exceeded $1 million. There is little doubt that being environmentally conscious is an all-around win for Timberland, its consumers, and the environment.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

"Army Green" Takes on New Meaning by Tina Marie Bibergall

The US military has already been actively engaged in efforts to shrink its carbon footprint for several years. Solar-powered water purification systems have been implemented in Afghanistan, and a US Navy jet has been designed to be partially fueled by biofuel in conjunction with a $500 million biofuel investment by the Navy.

Perhaps one of the most innovative attempts for the Army to “go green” however, has been recently unveiled by BAE Systems, one of the defense contractors competing to design a hybrid-electric, next generation Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV). The vehicle would push the Army’s efforts forward in modernizing its armored fighting vehicles.

GCV’s will be different than traditional tanks in that they will offer improved survivability and state-of-the-art mobility and power management functions. The system would be capable of integration with unmanned systems and dismounted soldiers. This requirement – protection and mobility – was outlined in several documents published by the US Army as among the top priorities for the GCV that is expected to begin replacing the M2/M3 Bradley Infantry Combat Vehicle.

Other non-negotiable features on the Army’s GCV wish list: the vehicle must carry a full squad of nine soldiers plus the vehicle crew, must provide flexibility to accommodate technology growth, and must be able to be implemented into the field within seven years. This requirement to design and field a defense vehicle such as the GCV within that short a timeframe, is a tall order.

Expanding on the issue of protection, infantry squads and vehicle crews are more frequently being put into situations in Iraq and Afghanistan where improvised explosive devices (IEDs) are being used as a threat. The GCV’s must be both rugged enough to withstand significant impact, but nimble enough to drive like a smaller or lighter weight vehicle to quickly react to offensive maneuvers.

The benefits of the hybrid fuel system are twofold: additional driving range is gained with the same amount of fuel due to increased efficiency or, alternately, the ability to reduce the amount of on-board fuel requirements but still be able to achieve the same range as a non-hybrid vehicle.

The anticipated fuel reduction over a standard deployment of six months would be approximately 20 to 25 percent. The result is fewer trucks and convoys being put on the battlefield and in harm’s way. Taking into account that a staggering 30 percent of casualties in Iraq were due to convoys delivering fuel and supplies, the benefit of hybrid vehicles reaches far beyond the green implications to actual lives saved.

By implementing these new, state-of-the-art vehicles, the Department of Defense is not only a hero to the environment, but to our heroes as well!

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Product Parade by Tina Marie Bibergall

Picture the following scenario – I walk into the local discount beauty products store with my four kids; I have three teenage boys and a little diva daughter. Their eyes immediately light up at all the “product options”; it is a familiar feeling because my heart also beats just a little faster when I walk into the Disney of beauty products.

My two oldest boys go to the right – directly to the “good” deodorant and body spray that will make the young ladies swoon. It says so in the commercial, after all. My third son heads to the left – he needs the extra-pasty hair stuff that will make his hair REALLY spiky. He wants to look just like the cool kid in the magazine ad he saw yesterday while we waited in the dentist’s office.

My little girl, oh my darling little girl…she doesn’t know which way to head first! Does she need body spray, glitter gloss, glow-in-the-dark nail polish, or just some strawberry- scented hairspray?

As American consumers, we have been convinced by hair stylists, makeup artists, estheticians, Hollywood icons, and even some doctors that the more “product” you purchase and use, the better you will look. We are even sold on the fact that the more of these items we use, the better we will FEEL; we will be healthier, our hair will not gray as quickly, our teeth will be whiter, and our nails longer.

Some of these claims may be true, but at what risk to the environment? In addition, some of these claims may be completely false if you are not carefully checking the ingredients in your products.

If your house is anything like mine, you have several more “products” than you use and just aren’t quite ready yet to dispose of them “just in case” you want to use them in the future. These products are the ones to be especially cautious of because chances are they were manufactured prior to the introduction of a new standard for personal care items.

Fortunately for green-conscious consumers, Green Seal has established a new standard for these personal care products and through its non-profit environmental certification process will make an impact on environmental effects as well as an impact on possible consequences to your health.

The new standard is referred to as GS-50 and affects products that are intended to stay on the body, as opposed to the GS-44 standard for soaps and shampoos that are meant to be rinsed off the body. The reason for the new standard is because the GS-50 products have different ingredients and therefore affect the environment differently.

The strict standard polices everything from product performance, ingredients, and labeling to packaging and social responsibility. Items such as lotions, hair sprays, sunscreens, insect repellants, makeup and antiperspirants have even more specific requirements to be followed.

In addition to the above guidelines, products must be free of animal-testing, carcinogens, and reproductive toxins or other compounds harmful to humans. Surprised that a product you might be using could contain toxic compounds? Think again. Ingredients that are banned under GS-50, but are not banned worldwide are bisphenol (BPA), phthalates, and triclosan.

These products are not only dangerous to the environment, but can be very dangerous to humans and animals as well. Adult men with high levels of phthalates in their systems may experience reduced sperm count and motility and increased damage to sperm DNA. Baby boys that are exposed to high levels of phthalates in utero or while nursing are more likely to have reproductive system abnormalities as adults.

BPA in the blood is a primary cause of polycystic ovarian disorder and recurrent miscarriages in women, and a recent animal study suggests that triclosan can have adverse effects on the thyroid system. When triclosan leaks into tap water and into lakes and streams, it is known to form chemicals that are linked to cancer and a variety of other health problems as well.

These three harmful chemicals can be directly introduced into the human body by using products containing the toxins or from consumption of fish and water that are contaminated from chemical runoff.

These chemicals are in more common products than the average consumer might be aware. Phthalates can commonly be found in any “fragrance” containing product, nail polish, food wrap, toys, detergents, and even pill coatings. BPA is used in hard plastic water bottles, food container liners and beverage cans, dental sealants and baby bottles. Shocked yet? Well, there’s more! Triclosan is found in antibacterial soaps, antibacterial cleaning agents, and even toothpaste!

Imagine trying to protect your family from bacteria and instead introducing a thyroid-damaging product into their bloodstreams. Very scary indeed, and thus the reason that GS-50 is so vital to the protection of unknowing consumers.

In order to meet some of the other requirements of GS-50, companies must have recyclable packaging, a take-back program, or packaging made with 50 percent post-consumer material. All ingredients must be disclosed, as well as documentation for energy and water consumption, air emissions, and trash and waste water generated from the manufacturing process.

The company must demonstrate social responsibility by providing employees the right to join labor unions. In addition, child labor is strictly prohibited and wages and working hours must meet minimum legal requirements or fall within the industry standards.

Green Seal has initiated standards to cover everything from building products to restaurants and continues to strive to make the world a more environmentally-friendly place to live.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

HP Remains a Big Player in Tech's Green Movement by Tina Marie Bibergall

Toshiba recently announced it was expanding its e-waste program to include copiers and printer cartridges; what are other computer industry leaders doing to contribute to the corporate quest for sustainability? For one, HP is making some notable strides with plastic inkjet cartridges.

HP’s PDR Recycling plant (PDR roughly translates from Bavarian as “products from recycled material”) is located in Thurnau, Germany and is nestled among several small and medium businesses that have created many jobs in the area.

At the HP service provider’s facility there, plastic inkjet cartridges are collected and sorted in order to begin the recycling process. Once the cartridges are sorted, any residual ink is removed and the cartridges are shredded. This is a vast departure from competitor’s cartridge recycling programs that mostly involve collecting and refilling the cartridges for redistribution. HP doesn’t believe that method passes their corporate quality standards.

HP collects the recyclable cartridges through three main sources:

- Manufacturing waste
- Non-salable units from resellers or returned and unused products from resellers
- Post-consumer cartridges that have been returned through retail stores or through cartridge collection programs or corporate pick-up programs

When cartridges go through HP’s innovative shredding process, the byproducts are small pieces of steel, plastic, copper and foam; this can vary depending on the exact type of cartridge. The byproducts are then sorted and sent to secondary processing facilities.

Foam and ink byproducts are used in waste-to-energy incinerators to create electricity; some are also sold for other uses on the scrap metal market. The plastic byproduct goes to a separate facility where it is combined with plastic from water bottle recycling and other additives in order to restore it to usable plastic that can be used in new cartridges.

By the beginning of 2011, over 1 billion HP Ink and LaserJet cartridges have been returned and recycled worldwide. This has all been made possible through the HP Planet Partners Return and Recycling program. This program was started in 1991, so in two decades since the program was started the achievements have been extraordinary. The numbers are impressive with regard to components of HP ink cartridges as well; the recycled plastic leaves a 22 percent smaller carbon footprint than its pure plastic counterparts. Fossil fuel is reduced by 50 percent and water consumption goes down by 69 percent per HP’s lifecycle assessment studies.

HP is currently researching ways to improve the recycling process further by separating the recyclable components before shredding. This will more efficiently prepare the components for recycling.


HP’s efforts haven’t stopped with just ink cartridges; the company also provides convenient ways to recycle computer equipment, cell phones, and rechargeable batteries. In most cases, postage-paid packaging can be used to return these items to an HP center.

HP is also passing the benefits of its green initiatives on to customers through its HP Renew Program – several lines of servers and storage options can be purchased to extend the usable life of IT hardware and also make it more accessible to people who might not otherwise have the opportunity to buy new technology.

In today’s age of stricter IT budgets, HP offers a viable option by taking products that are customer returns, cancelled orders, demo units, and lease returns and “recycling” them to consumers. The units are carefully inspected, refurbished or remanufactured as needed, and re-boxed. An HP limited warranty is even offered on these units that have eighteen months or less of original use.

HP performs the same service with several items that are more than eighteen months old: larger servers, superdomes, workstations, business desktops, and business monitors. These programs are offered to customers within the United States; similar programs are offered for customers worldwide.

On a global level, HP is working hard to prove it is doing its part in the industry-wide effort to contribute less e-Waste to the environment.

Thursday, May 19, 2011